Formulation of the Claim
Islamic consciousness received the Qur’an as an integrated unity, not as scattered texts.
Explanation
Arkoun argues that Muslims treated the Qur’an as a single whole that gathers its meanings and guidance within one structure. This unity in reception did not abolish the possibility of differences in understanding; rather, it remained open to multiple interpretations.
Its Place in the Book’s Argument
This atom falls within the book’s concern with the way the Qur’an is present in Islamic consciousness: not merely as textual material, but as an object around which a collective religious perception took shape. It converges with Arkoun’s theses close to the critique of modes of reading that confine the text to a single use or to a closed meaning.
Limits of the Claim
This atom does not mean that Islamic reception was unified in all periods, or that interpretations were identical; it concerns the image of the Qur’an in general consciousness more than it traces the history of each particular reading.