Formulation of the Claim
The text calls for bringing the Qur’an into the field of historical and scientific research, and for comparing it with the Torah and the Gospel within a single research horizon.
Explanation
The text proposes studying the Qur’an as an object of dialectical scientific inquiry into revelation, truth, and history, rather than as a field closed off to sanctity alone. At the same time, it places it within a comparative approach that includes the Torah and the Gospel, so that the major religious texts become the subject of the same kind of study.
Its Place in the Book’s Argument
This idea serves the book’s effort to broaden the horizon of reading from purely devotional reception to critical comparative inquiry, linking the Qur’anic text to the history of its formation and to questions of comparison with other religious texts.
What the Atom Does Not Say
This formulation does not separate two distinct dimensions in the book: bringing the Qur’an into historical inquiry on the one hand, and comparing it with the Torah and the Gospel on the other. Nor does it settle the nature of this comparison or its limits.
Brief Evidence
The text calls for studying the Qur’an within a dialectical scientific inquiry into revelation, truth, and history, and for integrating it with the Torah and the Gospel in the same research field.