Formulation of the claim
Modern ijtihad moved from early reform to political stasis, and then to the rise of political Islam.
Explanation
The text presents the developments of the concept of ijtihad in modern history, beginning with early reform under Muhammad Abduh, then its interruption in the political track, before it later became associated with the rise of political Islam.
Its place in the book’s argument
This idea falls within the book’s tracing of the transformations of ijtihad in the modern context, as a concept that remained not purely juristic, but entered into paths of reform, politics, and historical transformation.
What the atom does not say
This formulation does not spell out the causes of the stasis or the detailed stages of transformation, nor does it expand on the intellectual contexts surrounding each stage.
Brief evidence
Is it this? Less clarification, and they can. For ijtihad, the new and the necessary probable tasks Critical? Islamic for a thought we must entrust it to The correct orientation And his school that Muhammad Abduh practiced. What happened to the new ijtihad we know and we say that When the Imam and Professor opened promising paths, relying on a pragmatic rationalist tendency(. 1849–1905) For jurists, favoring acceptance of the new reasonable thing beyond empty technical polemics and quarrels But this renewal-oriented tendency did not last long, and its reason was that national liberation movements imposed the priority of political struggle from the last century…
Close links
Islamic Thought: Critique and Ijtihad · Where Is Contemporary Islamic Thought?