Formulation of the Claim

Islamic consciousness received the Qur’an as an integrated unity, not as scattered texts.

Explanation

Arkoun argues that Muslims treated the Qur’an as a single whole that gathers its meanings and guidance within one structure. This unity in reception did not abolish the possibility of differences in understanding; rather, it remained open to multiple interpretations.

Its Place in the Book’s Argument

This atom falls within the book’s concern with the way the Qur’an is present in Islamic consciousness: not merely as textual material, but as an object around which a collective religious perception took shape. It converges with Arkoun’s theses close to the critique of modes of reading that confine the text to a single use or to a closed meaning.

Limits of the Claim

This atom does not mean that Islamic reception was unified in all periods, or that interpretations were identical; it concerns the image of the Qur’an in general consciousness more than it traces the history of each particular reading.

Brief Evidence Passage

This process is what led to the formation of what became the codex for all believers. What is meant here by the codex is the collection of pages bound together within a single volume. Orientalists and philologists have studied the problems posed by the process of collecting the verses and suras, and how they were initially fixed linguistically and grammatically, especially before the completion of dotting and vocalization.